Upon spotting my first Y2K Fireblade earlier this
year, I tagged it as bland and not worthy of the Fireblade moniker,
purely because it did not instil the same amount of WOW factor
as the original CBR900RRN when that was launched nearly a decade
ago.
Well, let's be fair, that's a tall order to achieve a second
time, let alone get it right first time? Tadao Baba is the man
who invented the CBR900RR, but I think it was some Swedish bloke
that actually came up with the name "Fireblade" - whilst
pissed on Saki? Alright, (for Wayne only) Suzuki did have a go
earlier in the 80's at doing what Honda managed successfully later,
but the 1100BC didn't quite do what the Fireblade did. It looked
alright for it's day and did have an ally frame, with a good power
to weight ratio, but then Suzuki went completely the other way.
The reason they did this is because, at the time, Euroland "sports"
bike riders wanted big heavy bikes with straight line power and
long bendy old chassis, so that's what the Japs built for us,
so it's our own fault. However, when Tadao (T to his mates) designed
the Blade, he wanted a good power to weight ratio, so, voila,
a Fireblade!! 120 odd ponies in a package weighing no more than
185 kgs dry. Unheard of by the other bikes on the road at the
time, so easier to do and to get right first time, because, love
'em or hate 'em, Blades are the business and have been for a long
time, although no Fireblade model since the RRN has quite captured
what that one did. I had an RRN and I had Street Tiger RRR. The
RRR was a nicer all round bike, but Honda had taken the rough
edges from it and somehow spoiled it.
For the past few years the R1 has been top dog and we all thought
that Honda would get it right this year. Well, Honda claim that
the new Blade produces 152 bhp at 11,000 revs and that the bike
only has a dry weight of 170 KGs, so one would think that Honda
had got it right. After the launch earlier this year, and then
comparisons against the Y2K R1 and the Y2K Gixer, it didn't seem
that Honda had done what they did back in '92. The R1 was more
powerful, the Gixer was better on a track and the Blade was not
producing 152 bhp!! If it was, it was losing a lot, certainly
more than you would normally lose, between the crank and the rear
wheel somewhere!
However, as time went on and a few long-term Blades were being
used by the magazines, people started to find the qualities the
bike truly possessed. This was not meant to be a Blade that conquered
all, it was meant to push the other factories that bit harder
to beat them, but certainly not as an all rounder and I believe
that is what the Blade truly is, it's brilliant everywhere, not
just in one department.
How do I know this? Well, I've just bought one and I'm absolutely
delighted with it, below are some of the reasons why.
Chassis - Excellent!! Complimented very nicely by a good suspension
set up front and rear. I must admit, I do now know why Alec Criville
is doing so badly this year in the 500s', it because I have his
swing arm fitted to my bike!! I do and he's not having it back.
It's a work of art. It's also bolted to the rear of the crank
cases and this would explain those funny looking bits of ally
that the footrests are bolted to. The only comparison I can make
to how good it holds a line is a 996 SPS, I do believe it is that
good.
Tyres
- This is the first time I have bought a new bike that comes with
pukka rubber as OE. Bridgestone 010s'. Don't know why they chose
MEZ3s' or 207s' (although these aren't bad) for the SP-1??
Brakes - Excellent!! 330 mm disks, the largest on any mass produced
bike, Honda claim. But, boy do they work. They will be great fun
entering Brakelikfuk curve at the Nurburgring, can't wait.
Looks - Not so excellent at first glance, but they do grow on
you. Blue and Yellow is by far the prettiest, just happens to
be the colours I have. Also, the coolant reservoir is between
the engine and the exhaust headers/down pipes?? Odd place to put
that I think? It's highly visible too.
Controls
- As you'd expect, excellent!!, They all work and are easy to
use and the dash is very easy to read, nice big Speedo numbers
flashing away at you, seems to be the order of the day now and
it does seem very user friendly too. It has 2 x trip, again the
norm these days and a clock too, so no one can nick your Casio
watch velcroed to the top yoke any longer, they just nick the
whole bike.
Suspension - Front are now USD forks, certainly something Honda
don't normally go for, but these babies work beautifully on the
road, loads of feedback and not overly hard once travelling, but
do seem very firm while at a standstill. That's low and high-speed
damping for you. Rear seems OK, not brilliant, but then again
the shock is for 2 people, not one. However, I will soften it
up a bit and try it then, but not too much or you lose the feel.
Engine - Clutch is very rumbly on tickover. This will be mentioned
come service time. Other than that? Faultless, but maybe lacking
in character a tad, it doesn't go mental at 8 or 9,000 rpm, but
produces loads more grunt than you might expect from 3,000 rpm,
that may be to do with this H-VIX thingy that it has, but I don't
know. Certainly feels fast enough, even without Ram Air.
Fuelling
- PGM-FI, fuel injection for want of another term. Pretty good,
seeing as Honda have only just started this on mass produced bikes.
I won't call the RC45 mass produced as it wasn't really, but it
did have FI first. The Blade FI is a bit flat at times, but you
get used to these things and work around them. Haven't tried it
in town traffic too much, so can't really comment on it at present.
Gearbox - Well, what can I say, apart from
.excellent!!
(in bold letters too) Yes, you read right, Honda have produced
a good gearbox. It really is a joy to use, it's snicks into gear
here and snicks into gear there. It's bloody lovely.
Lights - Good god, there's 5, (five) bulbs up front, 2 x side
lights, 2 x high beam and 1 x dip beam. They work well too turning
night into day at the touch of a button. The light at the back
is red and that's all I know or ever wish to know about it.
Security - It has a thing called H.I.S.S. (his? no mine), this
is Hondas' very own Immobiliser system. Brilliant!!, well, it
would be if NU recognised it. But Honda Link do! (of course),
but hey, aren't they underwritten by NU? Oh yeah, so they are.
Confused? You should be. So I've had a Spyball fitted to it which
is nowhere near as user friendly as the Abletronics one I had
on my Gixer. But it was 150 quid cheaper.
Boot - PUKKA !! Loads of room for your sarnies and weekly food
shopping, just so long as it's a couple of tins of Baked Beans.
The keyhole for this is now below the rear light so it's all been
tidied up a bit from the last efforts.
Comfort - Well, the seat is a bit hard, but you only notice this
if you are mincing around on motorways and I do not intend for
my bike to do hardly any of that unless I'm going somewhere really
nice and need to get there quickly.