http://www.roadracers.co.uk ....



  KTM RC8R 2011

A few years ago when the RC8 first came out I tested one in Belgium and it became a bit of a love/hate relationship, purely as I wanted the bike to be good enough for me to buy. Admittedly, it had some good points and potential, but these were outweighed by the bad points.

A few years down the road though and I've had to look at the KTM RC8 again, but they no longer make the base model, they only make the R model, which by all accounts has been heavily revised for 2011 and therefore comes back into focus for myself, mainly due to the following;

a) It is a sports bike, and I need a sports bike as my friends ride sports bikes or it's just unfair competition.
b) It's the only sports bike with multi-adjustable rider positions for those suffering old war wounds/sports injuries.

The revisions KTM advertise all revolve around ride and power delivery - suspension front and rear improved 30% in damping efficiency and still from WP thankfully, a twin spark plug head for each of the 2 cylinders to allow better combustion, improved fuel injectors, more BHP and a couple of kgs lighter, by all accounts.

When first seeing the 2011 model it looks nicer than the 2008, purely because it has better paint design, still plenty of orange, but better looking overall.

The instrument layout has not changed and neither has the vibration above 7K revs, it really does let you know you are alive, everything buzzes with vibration, but I can't say if it's worse, or better, I just know it vibrates. Perhaps shudders is a better word, this is not Beach Boys stuff.

The mirrors still have a mind of their own and alter as you ride along, but you can't see much more than your elbows even when they aren't vibrating. Your hands still hit the mirrors when on full lock ... all in all it still has a bit of sorting to be done, I just hope KTM can be bothered to do this. The seat is still wafer thin and hard, not totally uncomfortable for back roads but motorways would be a big mistake.

It still has a several nice touches like the filler cap skirt to stop fuel splashing onto the tank, and an all too easily hit lap time button on the left clip on that offers a few different options of on screen display, too many to list in fact.

The gear box is still good, or was once I adjusted the gear lever…..the dealer had dropped the pegs as I requested, but hadn't adjusted the gear lever and it was hitting the side stand on downward changes, so I adjusted it myself.

The fairing still offers very good protection and is easy to get behind to stop any high speed buffeting, best I've experienced on a sports bike to date. And overall, it's still a V twin, good or bad? It really depends on what floats your boat.

But this is a V Twin that is stoking to ride. I always did like the power of the old one, and the new one is no disappointment, offering loads of low down grunt, (rare on performance V twins these days), and a good top end too, hitting an indicated 161 mph very quickly with more to go. Who really needs more on the road?

Well there is a bit more. Apparently there's an adjuster buried somewhere in the electronic dash that lets you mod the timing when you put 98 ron juice in the tank, giving a few more bhp. It's supposed to raise it from 170 to 175. Oooer ...

Other areas where I noticed improvements were the steering, incredible compared to the old version, allowing good corner entry and direction change if needed with a flick of the bars.

The suspension over bumps, when riding slow, is harsh, but as you pick up speed the high speed compression works well and allows the forks and shock to soak things up, offering good compression and rebound damping whilst offering minimal suspension travel but doing the job well.

I did a few of our usual bumpy back roads and it didn't get out of shape, it all seemed quite composed. The tyres are good too, my first experience of Dunlop Sportsmarts, very nice indeed.

So what is this R version? The original R was very track biased and although this one keeps that it is now a much better road bike, and I can see more usability in it than before. There is just one thing that makes me hesitate - where do you put your luggage? Tankbags are not my bag and plastic tanks don't aid this option anyway. I'm sure I was once told KTM would be making some sort of rack for the RC8, but I've yet to see it. I'm sure if I wanted an RC8R badly enough I would find a way of getting the Kriega US20 strapped on the back. Somehow.

Some times laters ...

In fact I did want one badly enough, so now I will have to experiment with luggage options. The US20 should strap on OK as KTM supply a pillion podule which looks to hold the Kriega strappage system securely. Not sure there are many other options but I am inventive so watch this space.

So far Arsey8 ownership has been pleasurable. I have modded the footrests to their lowest position, the seat to its highest and brought the bars up and back to their most comfy setting. The bike now offers a pleasantly spacious ergo and seems to give my knee a rest. On a 300 mile runabout on a mix of A roads and back roads at the weekend the bike proved a handy tool and the only part of me which suffered badly was my bottom - the ArseyAche is well named. That saddle 'padding' could do with a bit of added bounce so I shall be looking into options on that.

My sore arse notwithstanding, I have got to meet some interesting people - the RC does attract admirers who want to know what I think of it. I'm not used to this celebrity status, having owned a long sequence of Fireblades, but I shall do my best to uphold the principles of KTM ownership, whatever they are.

  Top of page