|

This is Yamaha's V-twin soundalike cross plane crank motor, so
it feels much more like a V2/V4 than a straight four. Seems to have
loads of grunt and makes a pleasant change from ultra smooth Blades
and whatnot.
Techno on the 2011 model is limited to an electronic throttle and
a three stage throttle map, girly, normal and gravel-trap. On the
road in October normal seems adequate, and even then you can step
the back out if you're quick enough on the gas. More adventurous
types can play with hero mode - the combination of great throttle
response and excellent rear suspension means you've got plenty of
feel for sliding the thing about. Make the most of it though, seems
for 2012 Yamaha will add traction control; spoilsports.
Hard
on the gas when a bit more upright the bike reminded me of the early
Blades, the front end immediately goes light and shakes its head.
Seems to be a reasonable steering damper fitted, so experimentation
needed with the setting perhaps.
Suspension is of course excellent, giving great feel and control
but being super comfy as well. Why can't the Italians and Germans
do this? I was chasing a Beemer S1000RRRR who mentioned a bumpy
little road I hadn't even noticed.
But there are buts. The brakes were shite. Dunno if it's just the
one I rode, but there was not much feel and not a lot of stopping.
OK, we're spoilt now with all these Brembos and suchlike, but there's
no excuse for poor brakes on a £13K bike. The setup looks
the business, so I can't see why they're so poor. And to add insult
to injury, the bike stood up when using the brakes hard (relatively
speaking) mid bend. Now this is something you do a lot of when riding
fast on unknown roads, so you want the bike to remain on course
when hitting the anchors - don't mind a bit of weaving about but
standing up and heading for the far hedge is a big disadvantage.
And the steering has a bit of a question mark. Chasing the Beemer
through a couple of chicanes left the Yamaha running wide and struggling
to keep up. Great when committed in a single bend and easy to change
line, but a rapid change of direction made the front feel slow and
heavy. Adding in a bit of braking and the corner got very untidy.
Reminder of the original R1?
Ergos are good, easy shortish reach to the bars which aren't too
low for decent road use, and leg room is fair - pegs are adjustable
and were set on low. If you do tracks obviously rearsets are a must
anyway so it's nice to see reasonably comfy road pegs. Seat not
too bad, bit firm but a feather bed compared to the KTM RC dumpertruck.
You won't be too John Wayne after a day's riding.
Looks? Well, they're subjective. I like the front and the middle's
not bad. But the back end is pretty horrendous. Underseat cans are
so 2005 darling, do catch up. Yamaha, do us a favour and just copy
the R6, please.
So, all in all a mixed bag. Superb motor, very entertaining and
sounds brilliant, even with standard cans. Great back end (ooer)
but a possibly dodgy front. Looks wise of course it's the other
way round.
| |
ENGINE
998cc, liquid-cooled 4-stroke DOHC 16 valves
(titanium intake valves)
Bore x Stroke 78.0mm X 52.2mm
Compression Ratio 12.7:1
Fuel Injection with YCC-T and YCC-I
Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission 6-speed with slipper clutch
Final Drive #530 O-ring chain
CHASSIS
Suspension Front: 43mm inverted fork, fully adjustable, 4.7-in
travel
Suspension Rear: Single shock, 4-way adjustable, 4.7-in travel
Brakes:
Front 310mm discs with radial-mount forged 6-piston calipers
Rear 220mm disc; single-piston caliper
DIMENSIONS
Length 81.5 in
Width 28.1 in
Height 44.5 in
Seat Height 32.8 in
Wheelbase 55.7 in
Rake (Caster Angle) 24.0°
Trail 4.0 in
Fuel Capacity 4.8 gal
Fuel Economy** 33 mpg
Wet Weight*** 454 lb
|
|